
Welcome
to Benchmark Consulting's Learning Nuggets
section, where you can read useful articles which may help enhance both
your professional and personal lives. Articles posted on this
section are from different references, external or internal, that are
aligned to our programs and core values.
Check
back soon for more informative articles.

Key
Differences
Between Life and
Business Coaching
By Kevin
Ecclesine
When guidance is needed to elicit a peak performance, many people turn
to
coaching. Whether it is on the field or in the office, or for hobbies,
personal
or professional reasons, successful people from all walks of life have
been
using this valuable tool to achieve their goals quickly and effectively
for
years. This may explain why new trends have emerged in which many
adults are
turning to life coaches in their off hours to search for personal
fulfillment,
while still others opt for a much different type of coaching at work to
enhance
their skill sets, expand their potential and make their employees more
effective in their roles in the company.
But how does one differentiate between life coaching and business
coaching?
One
major difference is that life coaching focuses on more personal issues,
while
in business coaching you anchor the work in business objectives. The
accountability is with the client and his or her internal advocate so
that what
they are working on is improving their leadership skills and ultimately
the
business bottom line. It does not solely revolve around the client as
it does
in life coaching. For instance, in life coaching a client’s
goal
may be to lose
weight, but if they choose not to work out or eat properly, it
doesn’t affect
the bottom line of anything other than his or her own personal goals,
whereas
when individuals being professionally coached don’t meet the
obligations
they’ve agreed to, there are extensive evaluations conducted
throughout the
process and the lack of expected results can resonate throughout an
organization.
Business coaching is a developmental process designed to help
individuals and
teams achieve and sustain top performance in ways that are linked to
the
organization’s needs. Recently this type of coaching has
taken on
whole new
connotation in the modern workplace. The
opinion of coaching has come full circle in corporate America.
Today, it means that a company is interested in investing
in its employees’ high potential.
Another key difference between life and business coaching is in the
reporting
structure—in life coaching it is just between the coach and
the
client, whereas
in business coaching the contract involves the coach, the coachee and
that person’s
manager. An alliance is created that is clearly understood and driven
by the
client so that confidentiality and accountability can be built. But you
should
never have a situation where all parties don’t agree on the
level
of
disclosure—you can’t effectively coach someone if
they say,
‘You can’t tell my
boss anything. In fact, most professional coaches encourage
collaborative
meetings and teach their clients to share information about the process
themselves, so it is reported from the client and the coach.
While life coaching directives tend to be mapped out with the
individual’s
goals in mind, specific or vague, business coaching can offer
measurable
improvements for both the person being coached and the organization
itself. It
can come from an external source or from someone trained to provide it
within
an organization. Of
course, to stay
competitive in today’s economy, it is imperative for
organizations to utilize
their resources to the fullest extent. However, today’s
leaders
have had to do
more with less, and in focusing on driving forward they often
subsequently
spend very little time developing
their
people.
That’s a trap many
leaders fall into—being busy can feel productive, yet
actually
slowing down and
using your
resources more efficiently can lead to much higher productivity. Some
leaders
can forget that there is a great deal to learn from their people.
One of Lee Hecht Harrison’s programs called Coaching
Practices
for Leaders
focuses directly on an organization’s management
level—to
provide tools to hold
productive coaching conversations, more effectively reach their direct
reports,
and ultimately retain their key talent and maximize their potential.
Experts
have identified several key areas that leadership skills fall into:
people
skills, business skills and overall effectiveness. In most cases the
business
skills and effectiveness are in need of less development than people
skills.
This is the area where most leaders are lacking. These very necessary
people
skills come into play for those in leadership roles when holding
development
conversations, bringing up issues about performance (positive or
negative) and
remembering to maximize their ‘people resource’ by
really
listening and paying
attention to what their team is thinking.
Business coaching targets the individual organization’s
direction
and strategy
to make the most of a company’s most valuable
assets—its
employees. Coaching
should be anchored in the
business objectives of an organization. You should establish coaching
relationships with enough process in them to meet the
individual’s needs and
still ensure a significant return on investment for the organization as
well as
the individual.
About
the
Author
Kevin
Ecclesine
is the vice
president of leading career management services compnay Lee Hecht
Harrison's
Grand Rapid, Michigan office.

Facing
conflict
situations? These easy steps may be of help. Breathe in and
relax.
Conflict
Resolution
Management
By Nariman Brahimi
- copyright holder
Conflict Resolution
Management
tangles
important characteristics. It is a strong preventive tool to encounter
and
defuse potential conflicts. It brings efficient and applicable skills
to cope
with interpersonal clashes and business conflicts. It teaches how to
manage
collaborative negotiation and achieve a win-win result.
Conflicts
bring plenty of
emotions
for
introverts as well as for extraverts. Thus, whenever you are caught up
at the heart
of a conflict, the following are five fundamental tips you can apply to
manage
your conflicts.
1-Step
back
"Vent"
your emotions,
acknowledge
and handle them.
Structure your thoughts and self-analysis, identify your positions and
needs.
Focus on the problem and not on the person.
2-Empowerment
and
recognition
"Put
yourself in the
other's
shoes". Understand and recognize emotions, Listen
carefully to
perception, needs, consider culture differences, and issues.
"Learn from the past and focus on the future."
Ask questions. Choose your words. Some words open up communication,
others shut
it.
Be honest and sincere while sharing information in order to establish trust.
3-Issues
List
and label all the
different
issues
involved. Begin with the easiest issues then endeavor the more complex
Be open, communicate clearly and pledge satisfaction for both sides.
4-Common
grounds
Determine
and specify the
common
grounds.
This process is a significant element for reconciliation.
5-Resolution
Brainstorm the solutions.
When
resolution is
founded and agreement reached, guard the main principle; ensure a
win-win
result.
Probe the "reality check" process; check if the resolutions are
concrete, doable in the present and viable in the future.
This
featured article will reinforce the learnings of our Coaching
program graduates.
A Coach, A Mentor.... A
What?
By Anna
Britnor Guest
Mentoring
can
claim a
3000 year headstart on coaching, but both are proving powerful aids to
personal
and organisational change and development.
Thinking
of a
mentor might
conjure up visions of a white bearded wiseman in flowing robes and
sandals or
Telemachus' adviser in Homer's Odyssey. The image of a coach is
somewhat
different: someone critically observing a top athlete, stopwatch in
hand. How
can either of these be of any relevance to a company on the eve of the
new
Millenium? Evolved from these origins, business coaching and mentoring
are now
widely recognised for their impact in leveraging personal and
organisational
development. For anyone who needs convincing, imagine having someone
alongside
you who is motivated solely to help you succeed; someone immune from
but aware
of company dynamics and politics; someone who takes time to listen and
to guide
you without any personal or political agenda other than the success of
you and
your company. There are few who would not benefit from such a
relationship.
Although
there
are some key
differences between coaching and mentoring, the edges are undoubtedly
blurred.
Mentoring is often referred to as the 'transfer of wisdom'. It is the
process
by which an individual learns from someone who has worn the same shoes
and
travelled the same path, someone metaphorically older and wiser. Often
the
mentor will work in the same organisation, as Marion Gillie, partner at
Sheppard Moscow, specialists in organisational development, confirms
'The
traditional definition of a mentor is usually somebody more senior in
your own
organisation, taking an interest and helping your career path'.
Coaching, on
the otherhand, concerns itself with amplifying the individual's own
knowledge
and thought processes. It is about creating a supportive environment in
which
to challenge and develop critical thinking skills, ideas and
behaviours.
Whilst
the
strength of
mentoring lies in the mentor's specific knowledge and wisdom, in
coaching it
lies in the facilitation and development of personal qualities. The
coach
brings different skills and experience and offers a fresh perspective -
a
different viewpoint. In both cases one-to-one attention is the key. 'It
has to
do with focused and intensive development absolutely grounded in the
business
in a way that even an in-house, tailored training programme often can't
deliver', says Marion Gillie. 'You can, in a one-to-one, focus on
intra-personal issues to a far deeper level than in group environments
which
can only look at the superficial'.
Based on
these
definitions,
most coaches and mentors agree that a good coach will also mentor and a
good
mentor will coach, as appropriate to the situation and the
relationship. In
considering the best fit, therefore, the two approaches should be
regarded as
synergistic and complementary, rather than mutually exclusive.
Organisations
implement
coaching and mentoring at all levels of a company structure, from
graduate
recruits to the Chairman. However, as with any programme or initiative,
success
is dependent ultimately on a high degree of senior level buy-in and
commitment.
Without such support, programmes risk death through lack of
co-ordination and
focus or even disruption by power groups or individuals seeking
political gain.
For the
Senior
Executive
In
employing a
coach or
mentor, the senior executive needs to consider a number of factors. The
first
key consideration is the objective - what am I hoping to achieve?
Coaching and
mentoring services are often required at times of significant
organisational or
personal change, for instance on promotion to board level. Many new
Directors
face a variety of challenges, from how to behave with former peers who
are now
subordinates through to operating more strategically. Whether the
requirement
is driven by the individual or the company, the choices are numerous.
For
instance, is it appropriate to engage a member of the same
organisation, a peer
within a different company via an exchange scheme or professional
mentor or
coach? There are no hard and fast rules: there are benefits and
drawbacks to
each.
An
internal
mentor can be a
powerful aide in providing admittance to parts of the organisation
otherwise
inaccessible. Their strength comes from their detailed and specific
internal
knowledge but this can evidently pose some issues in terms of company
politics
and matters of confidentiality. A mentor who comes from another
organisation
brings different benefits, particularly in offering alternative
perspectives
and insights. The downside is that mentoring relationships are not
always easy
to establish and maintain and can peeter out if they are not formalised
at the
outset and managed appropriately.
The
alternative
is to
employ a professional coach or mentor. The benefits are gained from
working
with an individual who is highly skilled as well as experienced in
managing
such relationships. Drawbacks are that an external coach may not be
able to
leverage opportunities for networking and inside track promotion.
The
growth of
coaching as a
means of organisational development and training is not insignificant
with many
prestigious organisations opting to fund one-to-one programmes for
entire
senior or middle management teams. Others provide board members with a
personal, external mentor or coach to facilitate improvements in key
interpersonal skills such as communication and co-operation within a
team
environment. Using this approach, a leading china manufacturer is
gaining
considerable benefit in examining, understanding and evolving how the
board
members operate as a cohesive team.
For
the senior executive, the coach is an ideal sounding
board and a powerful facilitator for personal growth along with
behavioural and
attitudinal change. He or she is an objective partner who will support
and yet
challenge views, behaviours and attitudes in a constructive manner.
Above all,
the executive gains an ally whose primary motivation is their success.
Organisation-wide
Coaching Programmes
Whilst
it has
been
established that a fine line differentiates coaching from mentoring at
senior
management level, the distinctions are clearer when one examines
company-wide
schemes.
Coaching
programmes are generally implemented at times of
change or rapid growth. Results can be phenomenal. Companies developing
a
strong coaching culture demonstrate a strong commitment to empowering
their
employees to learn and grow. These companies are rewarded with greater
loyalty,
involvement and commitment, which in tangible terms are manifested in
increased
motivation, effectiveness and professionalism of both individuals and
groups.
Whilst
an
increasing number
of organisations are introducing coaching as the basis of their staff
development programmes, a small number of forward-thinking companies
have gone
one step further. One such company is Mitel Telecom. Four years ago
they
replaced their hierarchical management structure with a coaching model.
Mike
Ford, Sales Director, explains 'We established that the traditional
hierarchy
was too costly and that we needed a flatter structure. There's no right
or
wrong, but we felt that the only successful management style for us
moving
forward was coaching. It means that we share a lot more information on
strategic things like business planning and new ventures with our staff
early
on, before final decisions have been made. Whilst this can mean more to-ing
and
fro-ing
the result is almost always an improved idea'. The
benefits
have also been realised in employee attitudes. 'We have high levels of
motivation and morale and when you have that you have better
performance. The
coach gives all the power to the people in the team. Their role is
totally
unselfish - they are there purely to make their people better in terms
of both
skills and performance. As
a result, our
people are able to make their own decisions and have the courage and
confidence
to do so - it saves me an awful lot of time!'
Whilst
many
organisations
recognise the advantages of this approach, the realities of
cost-cutting and
rationalisation have limited the time individual managers can invest in
their
people. Introducing external coaches can be effective alternative,
enabling the
company to adopt the coaching model in-house gradually over a period of
time
with support from an experienced team of facilitators.
Coaching
is designed to empower each individual to
understand their potential and to identify how they can achieve it.
Through
developing a sound understanding of the protegé, the coach
knows
when to
support and when to stretch, when to challenge and when to guide. Working
on a one-to-one
basis, coach
and coachee collaborate to set and achieve key development objectives,
taking
into account the needs of the organisation as well as the experience,
maturity,
knowledge and career path of the individual. Coaching encourages the
creation
of goals, which can then be broken down into manageable, measurable
steps. To
support this, coaching is delivered on a 'little and often' basis
through a
combination of face-to-face sessions, telephone and email feedback and
'on-the-job' observation. A coach will require each individual to
examine and
adapt their approach and to seek fresh ideas for boosting performance
and
personal job satisfaction.
Attachmate
Sales
UK, part
of the world's largest privately owned software company, is just one
organisation which has benefited significantly from coaching and
exceeded
revenue targets last financial year to prove it! Fundamental to this
success
have been the retention, motivation and development of key staff. Ian
Wells,
Country Manager, believes that '[Coaches] help us develop our staff at
a pace
that suits the changing needs of our business - and we can bounce ideas
off
them whenever we want. In
addition, my
staff like the personal attention that coaching brings, and
consequently are
motivated to use their coach to challenge their approach and technique
far more
than they would with traditional training'.
Sue
Smith,
Commercial
Director of Hanover Computer Systems, providers of IT solutions in the
AS400
and PC arenas, points out another key benefit of employing an external
coach.
'Our coach has become a member of the team. As with other outsourcing
projects,
the contractor has the incentive to maintain focus and enthusiasm for
the job
in hand - where an employee might not! Of course the ultimate goal is
to have a
happy, overachieving professional salesforce, which we are steadily
working
towards'.
Organisation-wide
mentoring Schemes
Whilst
coaching
programmes
are to do with empowerment and motivation of the individual, mentoring
is
concerned primarily with the transfer of key skills and with the
provision of a
formal structure for guidance through the company's procedures, culture
and
politics. Graduate mentoring schemes are one of the most common with
graduates
often mentored by a member of a previous year's intake. Such a mentor
is able
to hand-hold the new starter through their first months and may even
continue
to provide support for many years to follow. >From guidance as
to
whom to
approach for specific requirements to how to complete company
paperwork, the
mentor is on-hand to answer questions and transfer their knowledge.
Mentoring
schemes are not just for new-hires though, they can be highly effective
throughout the organisation. In an age where 'a job for life' is no
longer an
option for either company or employee, organisations need to ensure
that they
retain staff as long as practical and that they manage the transfer of
skills
and knowledge throughout the business. Evidently the objective should
be for
the mentee to become as knowledgeable as the mentor. Many
technology-based
companies recognise the importance of mentoring and particularly
peer-based
'buddy' systems to share and develop technical expertise.
Interestingly, in the
case of global corporations, such approaches are driven by the demands
of
organisational structure, such as 'follow-the-sun' worldwide help desks
which
require that the same level of technical support be seamlessly
delivered from a
number of support centres across the globe.
Implementation
It is
unfortunate
that
coaching and mentoring relationships do not typically occur
automatically. Both
require careful consideration of requirements, expectations and
objectives.
Format, content and timescales need to be formally agreed. They are
dependent
on mutual respect and empathy between both parties and underpinned by a
shared
commitment to achieving results.
For this
reason,
it may be
appropriate to use a third party to assist with the design and
implementation
of the scheme, whether it be based on a coaching or mentoring model.
This could
be a specialist within the HR department or one of the many
organisations
offering mentoring and coaching services, from the 'big players' to the
independent 'one person' practices. Finding the right match is
important: not
only must there be rapport between the two parties but the external
mentor or
coach must also immerse themselves in the culture and understand the
challenges
facing the organisation The internal mentor, meanwhile, must
demonstrate strong
and appropriate communication and interpersonal skills. If these
factors are
not present, programmes remain superficial and short-lived, with little
opportunity for measurement. Assisting companies in finding the right
approach
is a new Web-based service. The Coaching & Mentoring Network
offers
free
on-line access at http://www.coachingnetwork.org.uk
to a growing database of coaches and mentors both in the
UK and
overseas and
operating in a
variety of fields.
In
conclusion,
both
coaching and mentoring have much to commend them. Benefits may be
gained from
utilising different approaches across the organisation. A newly
appointed MD
may employ a mentor to assist him in his development into the role, he
may also
create an internal mentoring scheme within the R&D department
and
implement
an external coaching programme for the sales division.
Whatever
the schemes may be called, one-to-one development
can be a powerful organisational and personal development tool,
assisting
forward-thinking companies maximise success in the new Millennium. The
key is
to define the aim and objective and to implement a programme designed
from the
outset to achieve specific measurable benefits. In terms of the
original
question of coaching or mentoring or both? As Marion Gillie of Sheppard
Moscow
emphasises 'The labels don't matter - it's the process the counts'.
Anna
is a co-founder and director of the Coaching
& Mentoring Network and
Lauriate Coaching Ltd which specialises
in
designing and delivering corporate coaching and mentoring programmes.
She is a
conference
presenter and writes regularly on coaching and mentoring for
professional
journals including the Institute of Sales & Marketing
Management,
Success
Now and is the regular Sales Coach for Infomatics.
She
has been assessed and
awarded Fellowship of the Institute of Sales and Marketing Management
(FInstSMM).
To
get a copy of our Learning Nuggets Journal Issue for this month,
featuring PriceWaterhouseCoopers' Global Survey Results on Coaching for
the International
Coach
Federation,
please click
here to download the article.
|